Skip to content

Conversation

@Deniallugo
Copy link
Contributor

What ❔

Check that we don't have any inflight blocks with interop roots

Why ❔

During the gateway migration.
Every step is important. And currently it was not taken into account that some blocks could have interop roots, that were not sent to the SL.

Is this a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Operational changes

Checklist

  • PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs).
  • Tests for the changes have been added / updated.
  • Documentation comments have been added / updated.
  • Code has been formatted via zkstack dev fmt and zkstack dev lint.

dimazhornyk
dimazhornyk previously approved these changes Jan 16, 2026
@Deniallugo Deniallugo force-pushed the deniallugo-add-wait-for-all-committed-blocks branch from b47bc0c to 319e221 Compare January 16, 2026 15:38
@Deniallugo Deniallugo force-pushed the deniallugo-add-wait-for-all-committed-blocks branch from 1b4cfc5 to 193525b Compare January 19, 2026 09:28
@Deniallugo Deniallugo requested a review from a team as a code owner January 19, 2026 09:28
yorik
yorik previously approved these changes Jan 19, 2026
kelemeno
kelemeno previously approved these changes Jan 19, 2026
@Deniallugo Deniallugo enabled auto-merge January 19, 2026 12:59
@Deniallugo Deniallugo dismissed stale reviews from kelemeno and yorik via f89f28f January 19, 2026 14:41
Signed-off-by: Danil <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Danil <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Danil <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Danil <[email protected]>
@Deniallugo Deniallugo added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 21, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 31564c2 Jan 21, 2026
66 of 68 checks passed
@Deniallugo Deniallugo deleted the deniallugo-add-wait-for-all-committed-blocks branch January 21, 2026 07:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants